Shocking News! (Sarcasm)

As Page Six (and Get Out) reported yesterday, there’s allegedly trouble in Paradise in the D’Agostino marriage. Control your shock and surprise, y’all. I had actually thought it would last at least a year. Oh, Lu. I’m not going to say we told you so, but….

DM story below:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4702492/LuAnn-Lesseps-union-Tom-D-Agostino-Jr-rocks.html

Talk soon, Lovelies
-Allie

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Shocking News! (Sarcasm)

    • Yes, you have to take a lot of what they print with a grain of salt. However, there must be some truth to it because Luann made a statement to People that her and Tom are in love, that marriage take work, and they are working on this together.
      That’s a damn shame that she’s saying stuff like that not even 7 months in. They should still be in that blissfully happy phase – not making statements to the press that marriage takes work. I know I need Jesus, and this makes me a petty bitch…but that’s what she get’s for being so damn smug. Proudly declaring that ‘she won’ because he was marrying her. Now, she’s no prize either, we’ve seen her cheat on Jacques, but the writing was on the wall when it came to Tom.

      Liked by 4 people

      • I just sort of felt that there might have been a ring of truth to the story, it was pretty specific re: fight with slap in a restaurant, but when Luann gave that statement to People and didn’t deny anything, well….the first year should be the blissful honeymoon period, not “work”. I’m with you-it’s karma for being so smug, taking up with a cheater cheater pumpkin eater, and someone that slept with her friends first. Ew. She warned, shit, begged to be careful-but she just HAD to have that wedding. They’ll be divorced before 18 months.

        Liked by 2 people

      • I agree about her smugness, not pretty. But I think there would’ve been more proof. Sounds more like a spat that’s been exaggerated.

        Like

  1. They’ll overcome…
    Still rooting for The Countess over here!
    Honestly, when you marry someone in his 40’s or 50’s who hasn’t been married before and isn’t gay or dead-ugly, you can suspect he’s a bit of a player.
    She won’t change him and she knows it and he knows it, They went to hell and back before the marriage, they made a deal and they’re gonna stick to it.
    And if not, I’m gonna eat my wooden shoes!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oh I agree drankge! Though not a player, my man had lived alone for a loooong time and he’s a selfish brat and set in his ways but he’s not up my ass needy, is supportive and appreciates my independence. There were struggles but it’s worth it! I’m now in my late 40s and he’s in his early 50s and we’re a cool af couple.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Same here!
        Actually, when I met my men I was 21 and he was 37 and I was a farmers-boy and he was a bouncer in a nightclub. I was very naive back then and we had some major bumps along the way, but in the end we survived.
        I’m sure the countess is more worldly and sophisticated then I was all those years ago and she’ll stand by her man.
        And also, if I were Luann and being surrounded by all these jealous hags trying to shit all over my lovely marriage and if my new husband would cheat on me I would still rather die than divorce him and give those bitches a chance to say I told ya so! 😉

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s